| “Zero Dark Thirty” (2012) — movie review |
| Today’s review is for the modern-era manhunt thriller “Zero Dark Thirty” (2012), directed by Kathryn Bigelow and starring Jessica Chastain as Maya — a young CIA analyst whose entire professional life narrows down to one target; Jason Clarke as Dan — an interrogator whose questionable methods (torture) define the film’s early tone; Kyle Chandler as Joseph Bradley — the Islamabad station chief juggling politics and field pressure; Jennifer Ehle as Jessica — a senior analyst whose confidence and experience shape Maya’s early years; Mark Strong as George — the D.C. overseer pushing for results; and Joel Edgerton and Chris Pratt as members of SEAL Team Six, the boots on the ground for the final raid. Supporting roles include Harold Perrineau, Edgar Ramirez, Reda Kateb, Fares Fares, and James Gandolfini (in a brief role as the CIA Director). Together they form the backbone of a procedural story built around the decade-long hunt for Osama bin Laden. |
|
| Background: I never saw this film in theaters. I caught it much later (2020-ish) on streaming after hearing it was “the” movie about the bin Laden raid. The “delay” was mainly because I heard and took on board the political noise around it — torture debates, accuracy debates, and whether the film was too close to real events. This was only my second viewing of this film. Released in 2012, “Zero Dark Thirty” received five Academy Award nominations, including Best Picture and Best Actress (Chastain). It won one Oscar for Best Sound Editing (shared). Historically, it stands out as the first major dramatization of the bin Laden operation and one of the few films to tackle the post-9/11 intelligence world with this level of procedural detail. |
|
| Plot: The film follows Maya, a CIA analyst assigned to Pakistan who becomes convinced that a courier named Abu Ahmed is the key to finding bin Laden. The story moves through years of interrogations, bombings, dead ends, bureaucratic stalls, and occasional breakthroughs. Maya pushes her superiors, fights internal skepticism, and eventually identifies a suspicious compound in Abbottabad. After months of surveillance and political hesitation, SEAL Team Six is cleared to conduct the raid. The final act covers the nighttime assault, the identification of the body, and Maya’s quiet reaction once the mission is complete. |
|
| So, is this movie any good? How’s the acting? The filming / FX? Any problems? And, did I enjoy the film? Short answers: Yes; strong performances; clean, grounded filming; a few issues; mostly no. |
|
| Any good? Yes – with a notable qualification. It’s a long, steady procedural that avoids big speeches and sticks to the grind of intelligence work. It’s not an action movie except for the last half hour. Most of the film is people arguing, waiting, and trying to connect dots. If you like that kind of slow burn, it works. If you don’t, it may feel like homework. But as a dramatization of a real-world manhunt, it’s compelling. |
|
| Acting: Jessica Chastain carries the film. Her Maya is driven, frustrated, and increasingly isolated. She doesn’t play her as a superhero — more like someone who refuses to let go of a thread. Jason Clarke is memorable in the early interrogation (torture) scenes, balancing confidence with burnout. Kyle Chandler and Mark Strong both do well as the “management” layer. The SEAL actors don’t get much character development, but they feel believable as professionals. Jennifer Ehle adds some warmth and experience before her character’s arc ends abruptly. Overall, the cast fits the material. |
|
| Filming / FX: Bigelow keeps the camera work straightforward. The film uses a lot of handheld shots, dim rooms, and dusty exteriors. Nothing feels glossy or overly Hollywood. The raid sequence is the standout — shot mostly in darkness with night-vision effects that look practical rather than flashy. The explosions and gunfire are realistic without being overdone. The sound design is excellent, which makes sense given the Oscar win. There’s no “incredible” CGI spectacle here; it’s mostly grounded environments and real locations (or convincing stand-ins). |
|
| Problems: A few minor; one major. The film compresses a decade of intelligence work into a single narrative, which means some events feel simplified or too convenient. The torture scenes are uncomfortable, but the film doesn’t always make clear what was useful and what wasn’t — which is part of why it stirred controversy. Maya’s character is also written as a near-mythic lone wolf at times, which doesn’t match how intelligence agencies actually function (IMHO). The pacing drags in the middle third, especially during the long stretches of surveillance. And while the raid is well done, the geography inside the compound can be confusing on a first viewing. MY main problem with the film is the portrayal of the Americans ready acceptance of torture and the implication that it was a source of useful / timely information. Historically, torture has rarely worked – for timely information or otherwise – and one of the big criticisms of this film was the idea that the torture produced useful / actionable intelligence. I am not denying the Americans conducted torture. I am saying I found (and find) the acceptance of it (torture) – individually and organizationally – to be HIGHLY objectionable to me as a U.S. citizen. These people were breaking the law and should have been held accountable, not celebrated in film or let off in real life. |
|
| Did I enjoy the film? Yes and no – mostly no. The depiction of interrogation / torture, ruined the film for me. This is not a “fun” movie to start with, even if it is interesting and well-made. The procedural approach kept me engaged, and the final raid is tense even though we know the outcome. I appreciated that the film didn’t try to turn Maya into an action hero or force a big emotional payoff. It’s a serious movie about a serious subject, and it mostly sticks to that lane. |
|
| Final Recommendation: Moderate Recommendation (because of the torture scenes and lack of accountability – otherwise, strong to highly recommended). “Zero Dark Thirty” is historically significant as the first major film to depict the bin Laden raid and one of the few to tackle the post-9/11 intelligence world in detail. With its Oscar win for Sound Editing and multiple nominations, it stands as a notable film of the 2010s. Watch it for Chastain’s performance, the grounded procedural style, and the well-executed final act. It’s not perfect, but it’s a solid, serious film about a major moment in recent history. |
|
| . |
| Click here (28 January) to see the posts of prior years. I started this blog in late 2009. Daily posting began in late January 2011. Not all of the days in the early years (2009-2010) will have posts. |
|
|
|
You Must Be Important… You Got The Whole Plane To Yourself
Posted in General Comments, History, Movie Review, Movies, Politics, Reviews, tagged Abbottabad, Abu Ahmed, Academy Award Nominations, American Politics, Best Actress Oscar Nomination, Best Picture Nomination, Best Sound Editing Oscar, Central Intelligence Agency, Chris Pratt, CIA, Edgar Ramirez, Fares Fares, Harold Perrineau, History, Islamabad, James Gandolfini, Jason Clarke, Jennifer Ehle, Jessica Chastain, Joel Edgerton, Joseph Bradley, Kathryn Bigelow, Kyle Chandler, Mark Strong, Moderate Movie Recommendation, Movie Reviews, Osama bin Laden, Pakistan, Reda Kateb, Reviews, SEAL Team Six, Zero Dark Thirty (2012) — movie review on January 28, 2026| Leave a Comment »
Rate this:
Share this:
Read Full Post »