Stinkin’ Badges

“The Treasure of the Sierra Madre” (1948) — movie review
Today’s review is for the classic moral parable “The Treasure of the Sierra Madre” (1948), starring Humphrey Bogart as Fred C. Dobbs (a down-and-out American drifter in Mexico, increasingly consumed by paranoia), Walter Huston as Howard (a grizzled prospector with wisdom, energy, and a toothless grin), Tim Holt as Bob Curtin (a fellow drifter, younger and steadier than Dobbs), and Bruce Bennett as Cody (a late-arriving outsider whose fate tests the trio’s fragile alliance).  Directed by John Huston (who also wrote the screenplay and won two Oscars for it), the film explores the corrosive effects of greed, isolation, and mistrust against the backdrop of Mexico’s rugged Sierra Madre mountains.  It’s a story that begins with hope and ends with dust — both literal and metaphorical.
Background:  This was my second viewing of the film in its entirety — the first was decades ago, likely on a Turner Classic Movies binge.  I didn’t remember Bogart’s descent into madness, but I did remember the famous “badges” line, but not the full arc or emotional weight.  This time, I came to it with fresh eyes and a deeper appreciation for character-driven storytelling.  I’ve seen Bogart in many roles — noir, romance, war — but this one feels like a departure:  not suave, not noble, just unraveling.  Walter Huston, the director’s father, won Best Supporting Actor for his performance, and the film itself won three Academy Awards:  Best Director, Best Screenplay, and Best Supporting Actor. It was also nominated for Best Picture but lost to “Hamlet.”
Plot:  Dobbs and Curtin are American drifters in 1920s Tampico, scraping by on odd jobs and handouts.  After a brief stint in construction, they meet Howard, an old prospector who regales them with tales of gold and the madness it breeds.  The three pool their meager resources and head into the Sierra Madre mountains to search for a hidden vein.  They find it — and for a while, things go well.  But as the gold piles up, so does suspicion.  Dobbs begins to unravel, convinced the others are plotting against him.  When Cody arrives, seeking to join the group, the trio faces a moral test.  Violence follows.  The film builds toward betrayal, murder, and a final twist that renders all their toil meaningless.  The gold — painstakingly mined and guarded — is lost to the wind.  Howard survives, Curtin limps away, and Dobbs…  well, Dobbs doesn’t.
So, is this movie any good?  How’s the acting?  The filming / FX?  Any problems?  And, did I enjoy the film?  Short answers:  Yes;  excellent;  rugged and immersive;  a few dated moments;  yes — deeply thoughtful.
Any Good?  Yes.  “The Treasure of the Sierra Madre” is a morality tale disguised as an slow developing adventure film.  It’s not about gold — it’s about what gold does to men.  The pacing is deliberate, the tension slow-burning, and the payoff philosophical rather than action-driven.  It’s a film you remember — not because of spectacle, but because of character and consequence.
Acting:  Bogart is riveting.  His Dobbs starts as a relatable “everyman” and ends as a twitching, delusional wreck.  It’s one of his most unglamorous roles — and one of his best.  Walter Huston is phenomenal — his Howard is earthy, eccentric, and oddly joyful.  He dances, cackles, and delivers wisdom without preaching.  Tim Holt’s Curtin is the moral center — steady, loyal, and increasingly horrified by Dobbs’s descent.  Bruce Bennett’s Cody is likable and tragic.  The ensemble works because each character feels distinct, flawed, and human.
Filming / FX:  The cinematography is rugged and immersive.  Shot partially on location in Mexico — rare for the time — the film captures dust, heat, and isolation with tactile realism.  The Sierra Madre feels vast and unforgiving.  There are no flashy effects, but the visual storytelling is strong:  shadows, sweat, and the slow erosion of trust.
Problems:  Minor.  The pacing in the first act may feel slow to modern viewers.  Some of the dialogue is dated, and the portrayal of Mexican villagers (and bandits) leans into 1940s stereotypes (if you ignore the last ten years of Trump’s racism).  The violence is mostly implied, which works thematically but may feel muted.  Still, these are minor quibbles in a film that’s more interested in psychology than special effects.  LoL.
Did I enjoy the film?  Yes — and I respected it.  “The Treasure of the Sierra Madre” is a film that doesn’t flinch from showing humanity.  It shows how easily trust erodes, how greed isolates, and how nature — indifferent and vast — swallows human ambition.  It’s by no means a feel-good movie, but it’s a feel-something about human nature movie.  And that’s a treasure rarer than gold.
Final Recommendation:  Highly Recommended.  “The Treasure of the Sierra Madre” is a classic for a reason.  If you’re interested in character studies, moral dilemmas, or the slow unraveling of human decency, this film delivers.  It’s rated PG for thematic content and mild violence, but its real intensity is psychological.  Watch it not for the true price of treasure and for the toll taken seeking it.  And remember:  “We don’t need no stinkin’ badges.”
.
Click here (29 October) to see the posts of prior years.  I started this blog in late 2009.  Daily posting began in late January 2011.  Not all of the days in the early years (2009-2010) will have posts.

Read Full Post »