The Mask Of Command — book review | |
Today’s book review is for “The Mask Of Command” (1987©), written by John Keegan. Sir John Desmond Patrick Keegan OBE (Order of the British Empire) and FRSL (Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature) was an English military historian, lecturer (at Sandhurst – the English equivalent of West Point) and writer. Keegan is considered (in my opinion) one of the “modern” expert military historians. I understand his basic premise to be that conflict in general and war in specific is cultural and not necessarily an extension of political governance. This is in contrast with Clausewitz who stated that war is politics by other means. Keegan is criticized for “disagreement” with Clausewitz. | |
As a secondary aside, I started reading about military theory (“strategy”) back in my early 20’s when I began reading about generals (mostly Patton) and the works of B. H. Liddell Hart were recommended to me by a roommate. I read Liddell Hart’s book: “Strategy: The Indirect Approach“, which I must say greatly influenced my life by profoundly changing my view of the world. My hope was to learn about leadership by studying the great generals. Instead, what I found was that leadership is not the same thing as strategy and is, instead, founded on the person and the time in history the person lives, whereas strategy tends to be principled and more timeless. | |
This realization pretty much ties into the basis for this book, which is a study of four “great” commanders / leaders and looks at what made three succeed and one (ultimately) fail terribly. The three successful commanders are: Alexander the Great, Wellington, and U.S. Grant. The failure is: Hitler. | |
Keegan’s proposal in this book is based on “heroic” aspects (“title”) of military leadership: heroic, anti-heroic, non-heroic, and fake heroic. To do this, Keegan establishes the cultural climate of each commander and then tries to explain it’s (the culture’s) effect on the military leader via their proximity to combat and personal exposure to danger. Essentially, for most of man’s history, muscle and physical courage were the requirement of military leadership. As the age of gunpowder emerged, the risk to the commander increased and they were forced to withdrawal from danger and thus “military” leadership changed. Alexander had to fight hand-to-hand to prove his courage while leading from the front; Wellington could stay within sight of his forces, but had to stay a minimal distance from accurate musket range; Grant could not frequently approach the front lines; and, Hitler never exposed himself to physical danger (with the exception of possible assassination) and used propaganda to convince his forces that he was a soldier battling at their side. | |
The book has five main chapters (one for each leader / type) and the last is about leadership in the age of nuclear weapons. I found this the most fascinating (timely?) chapter of the book as it proposes a “new” type of post-heroic military / political leader and attempts to posit President Kennedy as this “ideal” leader. | |
While I found the book to be an interesting (sometimes fascinating) read, it was not an easy read. Keegan loves his erudite words and his complicated phrasing of sentences. The punctuation is “British” (I guess), and I found many times I had to go back and re-read a sentence or paragraph to figure out what the heck he was talking about. Frequently, his sentences appeared to be declarative, but were, in fact, interrogatory (questions), or vice-versa, and you (“I”) couldn’t tell until you (“I”) hit the question mark or period at the end of the sentence. Occasionally, even though I was aware of this writing style, Keegan still caught me off guard and I had to go back and try to figure out what he was on about. Which means I knew it was happening, and anticipating it, but continued to find it distracting. | |
Other than this (quibble), I found the book to be quite enjoyable. Keegan has a keen method of describing battles and you can sometimes feel yourself seeing the carnage and tasting the spent gunpowder in the air. At less than 400 pages, it seems also to be a quick read, but I suggest not rushing head-long through it in one or two sittings as the book is widely considered to be a classic and deserves a bit of contemplation as well as enjoyment. | |
Final recommendation: highly recommended! This book is a classic for a reason… The battlefield descriptions are superb and Keegan’s argument is well presented – even if not wholly convincing (to me, anyway). Still, regardless if you are new to military history or a veteran of any military genre, I think you’ll enjoy this book. There will, of course, be a few quotes from this book appearing on my blog in the coming weeks / months. | |
Two final thoughts: 1) I was not (am not) convinced President Kennedy is THE model for the post-heroic commander. I found Keegan’s reporting on / analysis of the Cuban Missile Crisis a bit simplistic. And, 2) even if I had read this book on first printing, I doubt it would have influenced my world-view the way Liddell Hart’s book did. Both are classics for any military reader, just different. Just sayin’… | |
. | |
On This Day In: | |
2022 | End The Filibuster |
2021 | Be Creative, Question Assumptions |
By No Means | |
2020 | I’ll Eat To That (Gemütlichkeit) |
To The Front | |
2019 | #ContinueToResist |
Except Willful Ignorance And Prideful Stupidity | |
2018 | More Executive Time For #DumbDonald |
2017 | Watched The Inauguration |
Two Geniuses | |
2016 | Come Dance And Laugh With Me |
2015 | Looks Good To Me |
2014 | Desire For The Sea |
2013 | The Fierce Urgency Of NOW |
Happy Inauguration Day! | |
2012 | One Path |
Sorrow And Joy | |
The Seven Year View | |
2011 | Emergent Practicality |
Archive for January 21st, 2020
To The Front
Posted in 2020 Book Review, History, Leadership, tagged 2020 Book Review, Adolf Hitler, Alexander the Great, B. H. Liddell Hart, Book Review, Clausewitz, Duke of Wellington, Fellow of the Royal Society of Literature, FRSL, Highly Recommended Book, History, Military Leadership, OBE, Order of the British Empire, President John F. Kennedy, Sandhurst, Sir John Desmond Patrick Keegan, Strategy: The Indirect Approach, The Mask Of Command -- book review, U. S. Grant, United States Military Academy at West Point on January 21, 2020| Leave a Comment »
I’ll Eat To That (Gemütlichkeit)
Posted in Philosophy, Quotes, tagged Cooking, Dr. Leo F. Buscaglia, Eating, Food, Fun, Gemutlichkeit, Philosophy, Quotes on January 21, 2020| Leave a Comment »
Food is celebratory. People who don’t cook don’t know how much fun they’re missing. | |
— Dr. Leo F. Buscaglia | |
. | |
On This Day In: | |
2022 | End The Filibuster |
2021 | Be Creative, Question Assumptions |
By No Means | |
2020 | I’ll Eat To That (Gemütlichkeit) |
To The Front | |
2019 | #ContinueToResist |
Except Willful Ignorance And Prideful Stupidity | |
2018 | More Executive Time For #DumbDonald |
2017 | Watched The Inauguration |
Two Geniuses | |
2016 | Come Dance And Laugh With Me |
2015 | Looks Good To Me |
2014 | Desire For The Sea |
2013 | The Fierce Urgency Of NOW |
Happy Inauguration Day! | |
2012 | One Path |
Sorrow And Joy | |
The Seven Year View | |
2011 | Emergent Practicality |