A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP | |
— Leonard Nimoy | |
Back in January (click here), I posted the observation that I had just reached 1,221 email followers. I found this an “interesting” number because it is a palindrome (reads the same backwards as forwards). I also mentioned that I was looking forward to reaching 1,234 followers. Again, solely because it is an interesting number: the earliest sequential number number possible with four digits. | |
![]() |
|
Today, I hit “1,235” email followers. Now, some may ask why is that worth noting when I never posted anything about 1,234. Three reasons… | |
First: The “achievement” was a milestone, but it was not a goal. To me, a goal is the end – like a world championship. A milestone is a step along the way – all of the wins (and losses) along the way to reaching the goal. I would argue, the steps you take to reach the next milestone are as significant in reaching the goal as reaching each milestone. And, many times, the road is as important as the destination. | |
Second: The “achievement” was transitory. The morning I woke up and found I hit 1,235 (first time), I had actually missed seeing the “milestone” (1,234) because I’d picked up two new followers overnight. This highlighted the transitory nature of arbitrary milestones. I have since seen (and reached) “1,234” followers several times since then. For whatever reason, some of my followers stopped following and I have also gained others. I have actually been back down to 1,232. | |
I don’t really know why I gain or lose followers. I can only say I gain and lose most followers around days when I post about politics (criticizing Trump) or religion – particularly if I post a series (three of four days in a row). There seems to be a tolerance level for followers: one or two times is okay, but don’t keep beating the same drum. And, that’s okay, I’m often tempted to do the same with blogs I follow. I don’t, but I am tempted. LOL. | |
And, third: in it’s own way, “1,235” is more interesting than “1,234”. For the latter, adding the first digit to each in the sequence produces the next in the sequence. 1+2=3, 1+3=4. Here, the next interesting number occurs with one place shift: “12,345”. In the former, the number pattern increase is summing two adjacent numbers to produce the next in sequence. 1+2=3, 2+3=5. Here, the next number in the progression would be “12,358” (still with only one place increase). | |
Of course, “12,321” is the next palindrome, which is also interesting. | |
But, why “just” interesting and not fascinating? Well, I started playing with the numbers and what I found “fascinating” was that at a certain point it is the “visible” number which is easier to find interesting. For example: “12”, “123”, “1221”, “1234” are all visually appealing (to me). But, and I’m not sure why, “1,221” and “1,234” are less so. I’m leaning to the lack of symmetry caused by the “comma” between the “1” and the “2”. In which case, “123,321” becomes the next “true” visual palindrome. I’m not sure if the difference is “unique”, but it is unexpected (to me) and therefore, (to me) fascinating. Why? Because looking back at the original post, after passing the milestone, I realized I used the number “1221” in the title and not the comma delimited “1,221”. Somehow, I was unconsciously preferring the use (in the title) of the visual palindrome over the normal numeric representation even though logically they are equivalent. So, while the numbers are interesting, it was my recognition of use which (to me) is fascinating. | |
But, like I said, this is just me being me. | |
(PS: “LLAP” = “Live Long and Prosper“) | |
. | |
On This Day In: | |
2022 | By Any Other Name (Or Description) |
2021 | Democracy, Pandemic, Economy And Climate Change |
Heaven Is… | |
2020 | Hoping For #46 In January 2021 |
2019 | Interesting, But Not Fascinating |
But Try To Eat The Low-Hanging First | |
2018 | Me, Too |
2017 | Apt Enough? |
2016 | Now Or Ever |
21, Pause, Restart | |
2015 | I Am Shocked, Sir, Shocked… |
Lucy & FSND-2 | |
2014 | Less Difficult |
2013 | The Spirit Of Liberty |
2012 | The Essential Freedom Of Aloneness |
2011 | A Problem Of Scale |
Fred Doesn’t Live Here Anymore | |
2010 | Another Book, Another Jog… |
Interesting, But Not Fascinating
January 24, 2019 by kmabarrett
I find it fascinating how fascinated you are by your usage of numbers. The workings of the human mind can be quite intriguing.
“I can only say I gain and lose most followers around days when I post about politics (criticizing Trump) or religion – particularly if I post a series (three of four days in a row)”
That would do it hehe.
Hi Cubby,
I tried to reply to your request, but your site refused my reply…
A hero is born not from the laurels
Of victory but from
The discipline of preparation
The courage of initiative
The benefit of opportunity and
The acceptance of risk
Hmm, I wonder why my site would have refused your reply? I’ve never heard of that before.
You’ve covered almost all of the bases in your response! I’m glad you did one of these challenges. Love what you wrote. 🙂
Ah, but did you notice? While it did not rhyme, it descended “D”, “C”, “B”, “A”. Also, and I would not expect you to notice this: the prompt was two lines, 4 words and 4 words (line 1) and 4 words (line 2). The response was 4 lines of 4 words. (Excepting line 3, which needed the conjunction “and” to be grammatically correct.) The DCBA was written with intent, as was the attempt at 4 words per line. I just couldn’t figure out how to make 5 into four without dropping the “and” to its own line or modifying the pattern “The word1 of word2“.
But then, I’ve never claimed to be a wordsmith… Like you devoted poets.
🙂
The funny thing is, while I did not notice the exact breakdown of the structure, I admired the symmetry in the form. You have a poetic soul, so it would be an easy step for you to write poetry, as you have proven yourself by writing a beautiful piece so easily while adhering to such stringent standards.
LOL. Yes. Gains far more around dieting / exercising and politics. Losses FAR more frequently around religion than politics.
So, tell me… Do you ever think about numbers – or only words? (Maybe “only” is the best choice of word… LOL)
🙂
I think about numbers a lot when playing the lottery. I don’t think that’s quite what you mean though.