The result of a mathematical development should be continuously checked against one’s own intuition about what constitutes reasonable biological behavior. When such a check reveals disagreement, then the following possibilities must be considered: | |
a.) | A mistake has been made in the formal mathematical development; |
b.) | The starting assumptions are incorrect and / or constitute a too drastic oversimplification; |
c.) | One’s own intuition about the biological field is inadequately developed; |
d.) | A penetrating new principle has been discovered. |
— Harvey J. Gold | |
From his book: “Mathematical Modeling of Biological Systems“ | |
— As quoted by James Gleick | |
In his book: “Chaos: Making A New Science“ | |
. | |
On This Day In: | |
2022 | A Crucial Skill |
2021 | Our Fate Is Up To Us |
Amazing Or Terrifying? | |
2020 | Still Willing |
2019 | Another Prayer |
2018 | After Silence |
2017 | Are You Looking Forward To A Trump Presidency? |
2016 | Three Errors From Eureka |
2015 | Limiting Choices |
2014 | Praise The Lord And Pass The Hypocrisy |
That Sound | |
2013 | Still Waiting For Answers |
2012 | Informal Leadership |
2011 | A Little More Progress |
2010 | Bec’s Gone Again… |
Three Errors From Eureka
January 4, 2016 by kmabarrett
Leave a Reply