Today’s movie review is for the 2013 version of “The Lone Ranger” starring Armie Hammer (as the Lone Ranger) and Johnny Depp (as Tonto). Now, I don’t know Hammer from beans, but I’ve grown to really like Depp since he went through his “Pirates of the Caribbean” phase. This is a remake / reboot of the classic Western genre movie hero. It is also a classic “buddy-movie”. I grew up listening to “The Lone Ranger” as a 78-LP, even before I started watching it on TV with Clayton Moore. Needless to say, I first saw this movie on its opening weekend and this viewing is from the DVD which I was recently given. (You can read my first review here.) | |
The “Lone Ranger” myth is a classic story of good versus evil. In this version, a man, dedicated to law and order, and to justice, survives an ambush, teams up with an American Indian (Depp / Tonto) and they seek to bring justice to the gang which slaughtered the posse of Texas Rangers and the Indian’s tribe. | |
Within the context of the struggle between good vs evil / power vs justice, the movie has an over-arching theme and then two sub-themes. The over-arching theme is exaggerated action typical of the “Pirates” series (same director). This is meant to visually stimulate and entertain the audience with “eye-candy special effects”. The first (for me) sub-theme is that peaceful folks survive by luck and this is represented by almost slapstick comedy (basically, the first half of the movie). The second sub-theme is that criminals can “really” only be confronted and controlled by violence (the second half of the movie). In this movie, there is a palpable change between sub-themes when the main character (John Reid / Hammer) decides to “become” the avenger for Justice: “The Lone Ranger”. After this inflection point, the action becomes intended instead of “chance / coincidence / slapstick”. While I don’t agree with the “philosophy” of the decision towards violence to confront the criminal, it is (probably) mostly inescapable in real life. | |
So, is this a Disney / family / kids movie? Kinda to mostly, but not entirely. There are a few scenes which are surprising graphic and may be too intense for very young children (under 8), but all in all, it remains a “Disney” film. I found it to be long, but entertaining, well worth the purchase price and I hope there will be sequels. Final recommendation: with the minor qualification about age appropriateness, this is a highly recommended film. | |
In case anyone cares, most of the “professional” reviewers hated this movie, while most of the regular folks either liked or loved it. I think (still) history will show it was better than the professional reviews. When I went to see this movie at the theater with my daughter (Sarah), there was a line! I was stunned and said aloud, “Don’t you people realize this movie was trashed by the critics!?!” What I noticed was there were of lot of older Dads and Grand-Dads bringing their kids and Grand-kids to see this movie. I like to think of this as cross-generational pollination of the “good and worthy” hero to those who follow. And so the myth of that hero in the Old West continues… | |
. | |
On This Day In: | |
2013 | Warning: |
2012 | Thinking About Beauty |
2011 | A Founding Father’s Argument Against Public Funding Of Religious Education |
Weekend Update | |
So Far, So Good | |
Archive for April 17th, 2014
Hi-Yo Silver, Away!
Posted in Movies, tagged Armie Hammer, Clayton Moore, Highly Recommended Movie, John Reid, Johnny Depp, Movies, Pirates Of The Caibbean, Texas Rangers, The Lone Ranger - movie review, Tonto, Western Mythology on April 17, 2014| Leave a Comment »