Today’s posting is about a book I’ve just completed last night and a movie I saw today. | |
The book is titled: “Disraeli: A Picture of the Victorian Age“, (1936©) reprinted in 1980, and written by André Maurois. Maurois is actually the nom de plume for Émile Salomon Wilhelm Herzog, but interesting enough, he legally changed his real name to that for which he was famous. Maurois was in the French military when he wrote his first book and the military was banned from publishing. | |
This book is the second I’ve read from the Time-Life Reading Program series which I collected back in the 1980’s. More specifically, this is the book upon which I based my decision to begin purchasing the series. I originally read this book in my young teenage years. I don’t recall if I was in the eighth grade of grammar school or a freshman in high school. At any rate, it was a fantastic look at another time (Victorian Age) and political system (British Parliament) which combined political maneuvers with a true romantic background story and it captivated me. | |
After his wife (Mary Anne) dies from old age (and cancer), Disraeli begins going through their effects in preparation for moving out of her ancestral home which must be passed on to its inheritor: | |
“Every fortnight for thirty-three years, Mary Anne had cut her husband’s hair, and every time the harvest had been garnered in a small sealed packet. He found hundreds of them.” | |
This struck me, even as a teen, as such a personal and loving act (both the cutting and the saving of the cuttings) that I believe it set a standard for me to judge male/female relationships. To this day, when I watch the movie “Phenomenon“, starring John Travolta and Kyra Sedgwick (and Forest Whitaker), I am reminded of this book. If you’ve never seen the movie, there is a tremendously sensual scene in the movie where Sedgwick shaves Travolta and cuts his hair. By “sensual” I mean it exudes sexuality without having any “sex” in the scene at all. | |
By way of contrast, I discussed the above quote with my daughter and she felt is was “creepy” and “like a stalker”. She felt there was no romance / affection in either act, at all. | |
Another point, which may be of interest to only me – I’ve been “saving” this book for almost 40 years, knowing I was going to re-read it, but in no hurry, because it was going to be like re-meeting an old friend. I don’t often re-read books because most of my reading tends to be technical in nature. I do enjoy re-reading some books – novels in particular. I assume it is because they engage me without trying to teach me. (That’s just a guess…) In this case, I was waiting for the above story, but I did not recall it was told after the wife’s passing. When Mary Anne died from cancer, I briefly convinced myself that I must have read a different book when I was young and I had purchased the series based on a complete mistake! Not that it would have mattered so much, but it seemed an irony that I was looking forward to meeting my old friend, only to find out I would be meeting a distant relative (a book about the same topic, but by a different author). So I got a chuckle (to myself) when I found it was the correct book. | |
No, I haven’t said much about the book – by way of review, anyway. Suffice it to say, it’s a very well written book, a fast read, a romanticized biography, and a fascinating story of a man who rises to great stature on the strength of his intelligence, ability and determination. Highly recommended!! As an aside, on researching Maurois, I found dozens of great quotes which you will no doubt be seeing over the coming months. | |
Today’s movie was: “Lee Daniel’s The Butler“, which depicts a fictionalized version of true story about a man (Eugene Allen) who served eight U.S. President’s over a 34 year period of working in the White House. The story is one of quiet dignity and strength contrasted against a turbulent period of time which covers the “Civil Rights” movement during the latter half of the 20th century. The main character (Cecil Gaines is the name used in the movie) is played by Forest Whitaker who I feel will almost certainly get a Best Actor nomination, if not win the Oscar, for this performance. He is brilliant! Oprah Winfrey does a very good job in playing the spouse and there is an all-star cast filling out many of the other roles. | |
In a manner similar to “Forrest Gump“, the movie intersperses historical TV footage with acting. To this extent, the film is certainly not original, but it is no less powerful. If anything, there is almost too much happening in Civil Rights for one to take it all in. Young viewers may be surprised to see how far the nation has come in just the single life-times of their parents or grand-parents. Having grown up and lived through the period, I was profoundly moved by the entire film. | |
Is this a “made for Oscar” movie? Yes, blatantly so. It vividly shows the horrors of racism and contrasts that with the dignity of a working man who only seeks a safe life for his family and a better life for his children. The cast is strong and the story is accurate chronologically (if not entirely factual to Allen’s life). More importantly, it touched me as a father, a working man and a family man with similar goals. I saw this movie with my mother, sister and nephew (Kyle) and my mom and sister were tearing up just as much as me. This is a MUST see movie and I highly recommend it!! | |
. | |
On This Day In: | |
2012 | Just Like Bubbles |
2011 | Caring and Driving |
Achieve Greatly | |
2010 | Unwise To Trust |
Attitude | |
If The Mind Is Not Tired | |
Irrationally Crazy | |
2nd Pair – Shoe Review | |
Ahnu – Gesundheit! | |
2009 | As for me… |
Health Care Reform Now!! |
Twice Moved
August 24, 2013 by kmabarrett
Okay, so I had really had to dig for a post that wasn’t a quote. 😛 You were onto something about the intimacy of the hair-cutting and the shaving. In traditional Chinese medicine (to which I make reference though I’m not Chinese), the hair is blood. A literal manifestation of your blood.
That is interesting! I am currently reading a magic/fantasy novel and the author says hair and blood can be used to trace a person across great distances.
He also states that you should never tell anyone your full name as wizards can use this knowledge to cast spells on you (kind of like a voodoo doll).
I also remember watching an X-files episode where someone gets called back from the dead by the use of their name.
It’s interesting how many religions view “words” as a source of power. Not just curses, but prayers as well.
Did your reference for Chinese medicine say how blood / hair can be used to heal? Is it for self-medication, or must it / they be used by another party?
I just thought saving the clippings was intimate and romantic! I never thought his wife could be using them to cast a spell on him. LOL
LOL I’m not talking about what someone else can do with them beyond storing as a keepsake. In TCM, you can gauge your health, esp that of your spleen/pancreas (digestive system) by how thick and lustrous your hair is. It’s not about choice of shampoo, though Pantene will have you believe otherwise. Hair health is simply a mirror of internal wellness. So the exterior will change according to the flux within. Even in Western med, you can get a hair analysis for all sorts of readings such as lead/cadmium levels. This was the Holistic Chef talking. As for me, a heads-up, buddy. I link to you again in the next post…coming up in about 4 hours.
Ah, I see! Yes, I am / was aware of the use of hair for some medical tests. I was not aware of its relation to specific organs. Is that on the Western side as well or just TCM? I understand finger nail and toenails can be used for other tests too. It would seem logical for all of us to keep a chronological record of these. But I doubt many of us ever would. Too much of a “ewe” factor (LOL).
Too much of a “ewe” factor (LOL). HA HA.
W Med is clueless about the interrelationship of the body systems.
I mostly agree. The west is used to trying to break things down in isolation so there are “better” scientific controls in our experiments. I believe TCM tends to view the systems as a whole. Dynamic and interacting, but as a whole.
Ya got it.
It’s a testament to how well you write that I actually read and enjoy a post of this length. I guess it’s also a testament to how short my attention span is. Anyways, I actually laughed out loud at the part about saving the shavings as setting the standard to judge male-female relationships. It’s not that it was funny but rather startling in a pleasant way that it elicited a laughter response. I don’t see it as being creepy or stalker-ish in the context of husband and wife. In a different context, perhaps, especially if the affection is not mutual.
I thought it was interesting how you stated your reading is mostly technical in nature. This makes a lot of sense seeing as how your blog reflects what you have learned from books, movies, and other media you have come across.
The movie you described sounds interesting, and if you say it is a MUST-see movie, then I am inclined to believe you and hope to get around to seeing it sometime before the next Oscars.
Apologies for the length of this posting. Sometimes I do run on… I’m glad you found it worth your while to get through it all. Usually, I try to put a caution at the top so you know in advance it may be a long slog ahead. I’ll try to remember to do so again, in the future. 🙂
The affection between Disraeli and his wife was very much mutual. Disraeli’s wife was a widow, 12 yrs older than him, moneyed and he was deeply in debt. It was said (by her) “Dizzy married me for my money, but, if he had the chance again, he would marry me for love.”
They were devoted to each other and her death was very hard on him.
My wife and I have saved every card we’ve ever given each other (two drawers full)! Sentimental and foolish, yes. But we are, and both freely admit it. It has worked for us!
I do think “The Butler” is a must-see movie. I don’t know your age or ethnic background or social-economic status, but the first is critical while the latter two are merely important. I say this because when I look around and see the laws being passed to break unions and stop people from voting I shudder to remember how quickly the U.S. passed from Reconstruction to Jim Crow laws.
We have had 70 years of trying to get equal voting rights for all races. We still have not passed an equal rights amendment for women. And we are sliding back into an era of children working; no health and safety standards in the work place; and, poverty and ill health for anyone who hopes to retire.
My point is not, “Woe is me / us!” My point is that this movie reminds us all of what America was, has only recently come out of (in one generation), and where we could easily return if we are not careful.
Please recall the words of Edmund Burke: “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”
Some will say I’m over-dramatic and being a chicken-little. I hope they are correct and fear that they are not.
No need to apologize for the length of the post. It is your post and you can do whatever you want with it. I did scroll down to check the length of it before I started reading, so I knew exactly what I was getting myself into before I began. I don’t think you really need to warn anyone in regard to length, unless people are really so lazy as to not want to scroll down to find out for themselves.
I am not very familiar with American history, although my knowledge of Canadian history is also sorely deficient. I grew up in a very apathetic generation as we did not see or experience firsthand the struggles to establish the freedoms that we take so naturally for granted today.
I think it is especially important for my generation (Y) to watch movies like this as it will help open our eyes at how our lives could have been so different if there had not been individuals brave enough to stand up for the rights and freedoms that they believed in. We have been a sheltered generation, and having been so sheltered, we may be in store for some rather rude awakenings.
Another excellent movie dealing with the struggle for Civil Rights (and national freedom) is: “Ghandi”. It will also help you relate to some of the struggle going on in the African American community between “non-violent protest” of Martin Luther King, Jr. and the “defend ourselves with force” philosophy depicted by the Black Panthers in “The Butler”.
Read the chalk board behind the speaker when they have the BP scene. It relates the initial positions of the BP’s, before true militancy took over.