Book Review: | |
We all have books we KNOW we should read. Some of us own books we know we should read. And, occasionally, we actually get around to reading them to see what all the fuss is / was about. Thomas Frank’s “What’s The Matter With Kansas?” (2004©) is one of those books. I’ve heard the book discussed on TV for seven years. My daughter has owned it for several years. And, I finally saw it on the $2 rack at my local used book store, so I thought, “What the heck?” | |
Frank is a Kansan who was raised a conservative (“Reagan”) Republican. He admits to knowing little of the working class and nothing of work as he grew up. He goes to college and is snubbed by the “better” classes of people at school and he discovers Democratic ideas / ideals. The book explains this conversion and, more significantly, explains why he can’t understand why so many of his fellow Kansans continue to support Republicans when it is – he feels – clearly in their best economic interest to support Democrats. | |
In the end, the most telling comment is that the Democratic Party has abandoned its most effective arguments for holding onto its largest base (the working class), by adopting a soft on business economic policy which is “Republicanism lite”. Frank says this happened during the Clinton era as an attempt to lure yuppies and other higher paid professionals and manual workers into the Democratic block. It seems this worked during the Clinton era, but failed during the Gore and Kerry runs for the Presidency. | |
The book also spends a great deal of time discussing how once economics are removed from the contrast, Democrats lose to Republicans on “values” issues. | |
In hindsight, the analysis seems correct. Unfortunately, Frank fails to offer any workable suggestions for either moving back to economic class struggle or converting folks on values. As a matter of fact, even just finishing the book, I’m struggling to recall ANY suggestions. | |
It is easy to see why the book is considered a “classic” in modern terms and I believe the judgment will stand the test of time. I would, however, note it was not a particularly “good” read for me. The cover implies the author is humorous / funny. I did not find him so. At times he seems particularly bitter about the disappointment / disillusionment of his early adulthood – the world simply wasn’t the way he believed it to be when he was growing up. This came across as a bitter tone through much of the book. Today, I spent some time looking at Frank being interviewed and he does, in fact, seem funny and not bitter at all. I admit this also surprised me… | |
Anyway, EVERY Democratic politician and political operative should definitely put this book high on their “must read” list. I believe it does offer honest insight and serves as a cautionary tale for what may be facing us in 2012 and the future should the country fail to re-elect President Obama and turn over the Congress. Given the number of Democratic Senators up for re-election, it seems almost certain the Republicans will gain the majority in the Senate. (I don’t think they will get 60, though.) The Democrats will do well to simply take back the House. There will almost certainly be at least two seats opening on the Supreme Court during the next five years. It behooves every patriotic American (Democrat and Republican) to not just vote, but to actively participate in the next national election. The last thing we need is another “unelected” President or one elected by questionable voting procedures (read: Florida and Ohio). | |
The future will tell… | |
. | |
On This Day In: | |
2021 | In My Unending Story |
Say You Will | |
2020 | A Day With No Sun |
A Beautiful Thing | |
A Moment To Rejoice | |
2019 | Where And Why |
Day 12: Pause Or Plateau? | |
Eating Later | |
2018 | Here And Hope |
2017 | Choose |
2016 | All I Ever Wanted |
2015 | Compassionate Toward Yourself |
2014 | All And None |
2013 | Voices In The Dark |
2012 | Does Uncommonly Flexible = Flip-Flopping? |
2011 | A Modest Review Of A Modern Day Classic |
Encouragement Is The Path To Immortality | |
A Modest Review Of A Modern Day Classic
September 10, 2011 by kmabarrett
MOST presidents and representatives aren’t an accurate representations of the people, (even Democrats, and not JUST Republicans) seeing as the turn out of registered voters(not including the people who are eligible to vote but don’t) peeks at around 50% and is usually around 30-40%! it truly is an embarrassing fact for our country.
I’m not sure what you mean by “an accurate representation of the people”. When an election is “fair”, I believe elections and their results ARE and accurate representation of the people. Statistically, we can sample far less than 30-40% of the people and get almost exactly the same results as an actual election. I would not even dispute close elections very much (whether they are Democratic like Kennedy in 60 or “W” in 2004). I think arguements can be made that both results were questionable – not from voter fraud, but from elections fraud). I think the case was different in 2000 when “W” was given the election by a Republican Supreme Court, despite losing the popular vote both nationally and in Florida. Had the SC not stopped the Florida statewide recount, Gore would have been President. Still, that is water under the bridge at this point.
The question is: are elections about economic issues or not. Traditionally, there was a difference between the political parties and you could decide your vote on this issue / difference. The book postulates that since the Clinton era, the Democrats have become Republican Lite on economic issues and therefor the only issues to pick between are “social / value” issues. Based on “values”, the Republicans are better at stating their case in the Mid-West and South and therefor get elected. My view is – this is probably correct. My complaint about the book was it failed to offer suggestions on how to move away from Republican Lite or how to reframe the economic differences. In any case, as many of the conservative folks in the book stated, they don’t CARE about economic issues if you don’t agree with them on their “values issue” (pro-life/pro-choice, guns, welfare, etc).